Reviews
Translated from French
07 March 2018
Applicant
Very low recruitment process. Advertisement put online to support their establishment in Switzerland, recruits in France for cost reasons. HR has no vision.
Translated from French
09 October 2020
Former employee
Very painful experience
What works well?
Potentially interesting projects, good technical learning for juniors
What could be improved?
A company whose success is based on the exploitation of its employees, starting with the lowest possible salary. Aggressive and disrespectful management of the employees' work that allows Apco to exist and grow
Translated from French
20 November 2017
Current employee
What works well?
APCO technologies offers the opportunity to work in cutting-edge sectors. There is an excellent atmosphere within the teams.
What could be improved?
There are serious quality problems within the company. Management does nothing to try to solve problems, does not listen to suggestions for improvement, their only objective
Translated from French
18 September 2019
Applicant
Engineer
What works well?
Company with great growth potential. Brand new premises.
What could be improved?
Very tight management. Would deserve a good rejuvenation.
Translated from French
16 May 2018
Applicant
No answer after an interview.
Translated from French
27 August 2018
Former employee
What works well?
Environment, organization, and work atmosphere. Open to people who have difficulty finding work (young people with no experience and workers over 50 years of age).
What could be improved?
Intra-company communication.
Translated from French
19 December 2019
Applicant
Recruitment
What works well?
No personalized message after a refusal that does not inform. Recruitment process not clear
What could be improved?
No personalized message after a refusal that does not inform. Recruitment process not clear
Translated from French
16 October 2024
Current employee
In progress
What works well?
Fair salary conditions Pleasant working environment and good working conditions Good atmosphere among staff
What could be improved?
Some rigid aspects Slow decision-making