Reviews
Translated from French
21 November 2019
Former employee
tense working environment
What works well?
sharing with others at the same level and helping each other
What could be improved?
communication, organization and respect for employees.
Translated from French
10 February 2020
Executive / Manager
We take note of this opinion in the hope that a feedback could be made and are open to any critical feedback that allows us to improve. Even a reference to the specific program would indicate where to improve communication, organization, and respect that is lacking. Thank you. Thank you.
Translated from French
16 January 2022
Current employee
Quality management
What works well?
The support of the hierarchy and the confidence given to the collaborators. Great margin of freedom.
What could be improved?
Office availability and support for continuing education.
Translated from French
10 February 2020
Former employee
Very good integration organization
What works well?
Clarity of mission, working conditions, general atmosphere
What could be improved?
Nothing particular given the working context (state mandates with the constraints that go with them9
Translated from French
17 October 2023
Former employee
redundancies over two years.
What works well?
Admirable team + association mission. Minimum salary
What could be improved?
Warning, toxic management, mobbing by the CFO/HR manager Since my arrival, there have been several waves of redundancies I resigned.
Translated from French
04 May 2022
Applicant
social enterprise without the human side
What works well?
The worker dimension contained in the acronym OSEO is clearly no longer present, it is replaced by a team of executives with a recruitment based on titles and not on potential.
What could be improved?
You don't have the profile, we have found a better profile, what is behind this concept of profile, in any case not the human potential, nor the skills, a priori only non-risk tags. The recruitment is based on a human non-intelligence modelled on a 15 years old AI.